
Unlike cloud-based products, Pagico is a native app that runs and stores all your data right on your Mac. With the carefully crafted user interface and unique features in Pagico, getting stuff done and staying on top of your business can be both easy and enjoyable.

Pagico review 2015 archive#
Easily browse and archive your projects even when there are hundreds of them. Then, see the big picture of your workload in interactive flowcharts compiled automatically from all your projects and contacts. Imagine having boarding passes right next to travel itineraries, or design drafts together with meeting notes. It is one of the few apps that combines task and data management into one easy-to-use package.

To level the playing field, members are no longer permitted to submit a paper for a nonmember or to serve as a “prearranged” editor for a nonmember’s paper.Managing tasks, files, projects and clients is nobody's idea of a good time, but Pagico will make your life easier by letting you manage all these things in one elegant package. As before, the final say regarding the suitability of the work for PNAS rests with a member of the Editorial Board. The member receives the reviews and makes the decision to respond and to submit a revised manuscript. We have also asked that members submit their contributions directly to the PNAS Office with the names of the reviewers so that the PNAS Office can handle all correspondence during the review process. To make the process more transparent and stringent, we have mandated since October 2015 that the names and affiliations of the reviewers be listed alongside the name of the contributing member. This track remains a privilege of NAS membership and is a source of debate with NAS members and nonmembers alike. The member Contributed submission track is a unique feature of PNAS, whereby NAS members can select their own reviewers, although the final version of the paper requires approval by a member of the PNAS Editorial Board. Moving into the next century, our primary focus will remain on publishing the highest quality scientific papers. A 120-word statement about the significance of the paper is prominently displayed on the first page of each research article to allow a casual reader to understand its importance.

More than 75% of published papers are Direct Submissions (i.e., not contributed by NAS members). In the last few years, about 3,000 Direct Submission research articles have been published annually, which constitutes an acceptance rate of 16–19%. The PNAS Office receives around 50 Direct Submission papers a day for consideration and, after initial review by the Editorial Board, about half of them-close to 7,000 papers a year-are sent for review. In the last 100 years, PNAS has published well over 150,000 articles and nearly 650,000 printed pages, covering research in a wide swath of physical, biological, and social sciences. Our Decemissue contains 60 articles, 293 print pages, and 136 online-only pages, with an average article length of 6.8 pages, not to mention all of the supplemental data. In contrast, PNAS is now published daily online and in weekly issues. Papers were between one and four pages in length, for a grand total of 58 pages. The first monthly issue of PNAS was published on January 15, 1915, with 17 articles, including a report from the home secretary summarizing the National Academy of Sciences’ (NAS) 1914 Autumn Meeting.
